In contrast today, the Chinese intellectual, had served as the academic and civil society while the dominant school of thought After the support has begun to get rid of the edge position. and liberalism and the New Left itself with the changing political and social environment, and increasingly intense differentiation, can refer to the internal logic. It might not be easily penetrated with many of its explanations and normative force of the field, will be swept away many things. dramatic political and social changes which continue to provide for the schools of thought fission soil, so that can not keep up with reality schools of thought to change the context of alienation or abandoned. Therefore, to address the limits of their own without extreme magnification but can refer to school to avoid falling into the trap of Renyi Si severe premise.
a cultural conservatism
cultural conservatism has long been difficult. because since the things, and try to use them to construct meaning of the Chinese people's life and the cultural system as the main characteristics of conservatism has long been marginalized. Although this historical reasons only to return to the original context-specific analysis was able to objectively, But it's destructive to cultural conservatism or carry too much historical baggage and much unjust censure .1994 Chen founded do alone, and has for a number of publishers.
This situation may be considered the formal end of last year .2004 cultural conservatism aroused attention and support of the community, so that opponents have had several important event means that it has begun to get rid of the edge position. Westernization has been very serious in the case of the cohesion of cultural conservatism that the Chinese people to safeguard their cultural heritage consciousness.
is worth noting that the greatest impact in the current three a school of thought, freedom of Marxism and the New Left coincidence domain has relatively more surface, this seems to determine their not much, which makes it with any one group can have some common language. In fact, although it can be left with liberalism and the new par, but the main is not in the same level. It is a leader of as it Chen said one can be tolerant of other schools of thought, including the During the column body, which in itself prove that the cultural conservatism of the inclusive nature and the platform. In any case, as a Chinese, br> But it is this, that the support given to cultural conservatism is based on more people worried, and those who only have skin in the form of Western culture, Chinese people can not cut into the body and this anger and life is regrettable. In this case, the brilliant traditional culture show once again, it is seen as an antidote . On the other hand the rise of China the urgent need to construct a culture - the spirit of community, one needs a value to confirm the existence of their own forms of cultural identity. If we say that due to cultural and political and economic relations and other fields tend to affect the situation complex as a whole, not a conscious interpretation of the requirements of political and economic culture is responsible for the defeat of the logic, then, only in the political and economic power for the spiritual world is not enough, there is no independence of their own culture test the reasonableness of this, it is difficult to obtain on the basis of the confidence the dignity of life.
Therefore, no matter how the cultural conservatives discussed the relationship between culture and politics, regardless of sages teach, The painful memories of authoritarian rule will be excited and produce a kind of realpolitik concerns, leading to an instinct-like offensive. If the , then it gets beyond the genre of broad-based, there may be loose. Such a situation is clearly not conducive to the cultural conservatism of the dig, so it can not fail to note that speech when the speech, to consider the limits and under its own to to avoid such a trap.
Second, liberalism since 1998
thought the site, although it is because some of its self-deconstruction and extreme views have led to its differentiation and many had the strength of the rally to support it. But anyway, at least so far, which are among the mainstream of civil society and academic status . It's strong momentum and even compel us to expand this thought: it might lead China's future political landscape. with respect to cultural conservatism and the New Left, for its advantage is self-evident: neither must and the negative impact of the fault responsible for the historical burden, but also has a very strong international background of the power.
from the thinking of Traditional culture is very divide, the average person's understanding of the cultural conservatism of Western culture is still stuck in the form like that kind of New Left has been unjustly accused of the need for history, What is left to say to reject. This simple and make a economic liberalism into the mainstream of economic reform, the official guiding theory, and those known as the New Left scholars, but in the economic exclusion of market share ideas, and many commercial media and even academic journals have liberal tendencies, but it has been subjected to suppress radical ideas. This contrasts highly ironic. and deadly is that they very substandard performance of harmonic not to be in China Most liberals as antagonistic, but rather two sides of the same thing. Here is a paradox: on the one hand and political liberalism, economic liberalism, the logic of hope and cleaned up the public that it is prepared to social and economic infrastructure, on the other hand the economic logical extension of liberal unscrupulous but deconstructs the logic of political liberalism.
the growing depth as the core economic reform and economic liberalism, increasingly by the public as a robbery theory. tens of millions of workers laid-off and very few government cadres, state-owned enterprises responsible for the people, the capitalists get rich. the great social inequalities can not make this reform more rational people to psychological testing. The result is a rebound to guide this values contained in the negative, and time and time again through the people's dissatisfaction with the destruction of the basis of political liberalism, but the strange thing is, except a few liberal conscience, most liberals ignore, or even public support. Until this time also, many pay a cost for the reform seems to have suddenly discovered that people Liberalism is a strong philosophy is a tool of the elite, and thus liberalism with Chinese characteristics have a profound resentment and suspicion.
On the other hand, liberals of the denounced as intolerable psychological rebound on the patriotism This performance can only be so many people and their national pride distance. Based on the history of bullying and traitors by the raging powers, painful memories, liberal people in this They hand-dug to trap the development of liberalism.
three
New Left and New Left liberalism was originally in the new Enlightenment brothers fighting side by side, they parted ways for the Chinese social transformation can only be attributed to stimulation Results In 1992, Deng Xiaoping's kinds of confusion doctrine and despotism, freedom can be both free and equal power of capital is seen as a return to the br> As the coincidence of their face more, the two rivals began in 1998, an open contest that field had a profound impact. They use different theories to explain the different conclusions drawn from a common problem, in fact, what China's reform reflect some difficulties. Both sides have accused each other when there is an official background, and paving the way seems to liberals as well as the capital of the suspect. can be used to expand its own logic that makes them even had a common language in a number of issues the unnecessary dispute .7 years later, Chinese society is still in the stressed the distinction between left and right line with the traditional standards as defined, at least, left the West with these characteristics. but a closer analysis, is not really anyone can be called the New Left. many liberals like to their opponents as the New Left, but these opponents who may be authoritarian, nationalist, nationalists, and these people are Economist openly admitted that he is the new left, Gan Yang and even called himself a Until now, Needless to say, not necessarily to respect the freedom of others. Therefore, the New Left and the outbreak of liberal freedom and equality in fact the main point of contention is the despotism Pu involving sexual freedom, and justice must be out of the feasibility of the theory can only be accused of supporting the moral critique of the weak and disadvantage. liberalism is primarily a constructive theory, and its success in Western countries the sample, the experience and institutional framework seems to be directly borrowed. and theoretical resources of the New Left, such as Western Marxism, postmodernism, post- colonial theory is some more deconstruction, critical theory. Even now, the New Left in the local issues can only be demonstrated convincingly that the establishment of the theory, but can not provide a viable theory of general political and economic system new design.
But this is not the most deadly. may lead to its self-deconstruction that some of the new leftists of the ;, this is for their trouble. Cui Yuan While certainly the partial truth in the reduction of things, but for as long as the the position of the weak, the New Left has shown the courage of valuable moral concern, but an obvious fact that the reform itself by denying the legitimacy of the birth of the laid-off workers and other vulnerable groups of the not really want to return to the . a particular decision of a few real situation some of the new leftists inappropriate remarks can only bring disaster to the whole, the intellectual resources have been extremely complex, involving more emphasis on the universal freedom and substantive damage to its image, to bring their own to some problems may lead to a crisis.
(originally published in
No comments:
Post a Comment